
Federal Ruling Says that AI Art Can’t Be Copyrighted
The latest in the AI debate is a ruling delivered Friday by federal Judge Beryl Howell, which upholds a U.S. Copyright Office finding. The finding — and the federal ruling — both state that artwork created by AI can’t be copyrighted.
This comes as people like CEO of Imagination Engines Stephen Thaler fight for works created by AI to be protected under copyright law. Thaler filed a lawsuit after the U.S. Copyright Office refused his request for artwork created by his computer system to be copyrighted. Thaler believes that AI should be considered “an author where it otherwise meets authorship criteria.” This is despite the fact that AI learns by using other artists’ and writers’ work, uncredited.
Even with this federal ruling, though, works created by AI may still be protected under copyright laws. The U.S. Copyright Office said it would consider each copyright case involving AI individually. Mashable explained that this could be boiled down to whether a work was produced solely by AI or if a human being had a hand in it. If a person is involved, the work could possibly be protected by copyright laws.
Find more news and stories of interest from the book world in Breaking in Books.
More breaking news here
- The Most Read Books on Goodreads This Week
- The Bestselling Books of the Week, According to All the Lists
- Apple TV+ Just Dropped the Official Murderbot Trailer
- The ALA is Suing DOGE Over “Gutting” the IMLS
- The Shortlist for the International Booker Prize 2025 has Been Announced
- These are the Finalists for the 2025 Hugo Awards
- The Most Read Books on Goodreads in March 2025
- Libby’s Most Anticipated April Releases
- The Bestselling Books of the Week, According to All the Lists
- The Most Popular Romantasy Books of March, According to Libby