Why I’ve Started Reading Books of Investigative Journalism

Investigative pieces not only gave me a compelling narrative about a significant event or even a seemingly mundane event with wider repercussions, but also helped me respect that what I was reading took a ton of time and sacrifice to write. I also noticed that investigative pieces prioritized presenting the facts as they occurred rather than curating a story with a personal or political agenda. As someone who works with subject matter experts for a living, I have nothing but the utmost respect for well-researched, well-written text that forces me to slow down.

Having grown up in an attention economy, where the sensational articles about celeb breakups or the latest TikTok feta pasta salmon rice bowl fruit cereal trend that gains traction always caught my attention, I was struck how these longer, more immersive pieces demanded more of me as a reader. Suddenly, rather than expecting aesthetic content delivered to me quickly and efficiently, I was happy to slow down and critically consider the words before me.

I used to be a slow reader as a child, mostly because my immigrant parents forbade me from watching TV or “surfing the net” during the school week, so I really had to make my reading life count. As an adult with her own freedom, I wasn’t always interested in content that forced me to sit down and be on the same web page for more than a few minutes because there was always something else more interesting to grab my attention.

Most content nowadays always seems to be pushing some sort of an agenda. This is fine, but it seems as though I now have a taste for well-researched content that presents events as they occur. It’s easy to read a headline about something that just happened or watch a recap on TikTok and think you have all the relevant information. But investigative pieces demand readers to connect the dots on their own and even to do their own research outside the lines of the article. That’s because investigative pieces don’t exist for entertainment. I would argue that they don’t even exist for education. They exist to make you question — that’s why really good investigative pieces take time to write. Some journalists spend months to years compiling evidence before writing and publishing their stories.

Although I’d been reading investigative pieces for a few years, the one that really made me go all in was none other than the story of Elizabeth Holmes, the young founder of the blood testing startup Theranos, when John Carreyrou first broke the story for The Wall Street Journal. My jaw dropped as I read the story about Silicon Valley secrets and intrigue and how Elizabeth Holmes somehow managed to deceive some of the most powerful people in the country to fund her company based on a product that didn’t actually work. I had drunk the Kool Aid of Silicon Valley early in my life, truly believing that its lionized founders were brilliant people who had to “move fast and break things” in order to make the world a better place. But the reality isn’t so shiny; someone has to pick up the broken pieces. Holmes managed to take advantage of Silicon Valley’s ethos and raise her company into a billion-dollar unicorn. The question is, how did she do this? And will she get away with it?

When Bad Blood was published in 2018, I had to read the book. It also didn’t help that ABC released its podcast The Dropout in 2019 to follow the Elizabeth Holmes trial. Bad Blood was the first time I dedicated my time to a book written by an investigative journalist, rather than just articles. It made me realize that there was so much more going on than what the headlines suggested. Although the articles relayed important information, there is an immersive element to a book that the format of a journal article cannot match. With the book, I have the entire timeline in my hands. What struck me was that Carreyrou rarely, if ever, passed judgment. This was interesting to me as a reader because virtually every book I’d read always had a point of view. That’s not to say that Bad Blood didn’t have a point of view, but it was never explicitly shoved down my throat. Instead, Carreyrou tracked the events that led to the dissolution of Theranos and how investors and employees were treated and even lied to.

Before reading investigative journalism, I probably would’ve just watched a documentary, but after reading Carreyrou’s careful reporting and subsequent interviews about how Holmes tried to intimidate him away from discovering the truth about her lies and coverups, I realized what investigative journalists put up with to get us these stories. Although investigative journalists are people and certainly have their own biases, good journalists tell a true story as it happened based on evidence that was meticulously collected.