If you care about book challenges and censorship, one Supreme Court case you should familiarize yourself with — which hasn’t been cited nearly during this flux of challenges — is Board of Education, Island Trees School District vs. Pico (Island Trees). This landmark 1982 case was the first to address the removal of books from school libraries across the country. Though it was a 5-4 split within the court, the ruling in favor of Pico meant that no school board could remove books from a library once it’d been added, simply because they disagreed with the content within it.
Justice Brennan, in announcing the judgement which did not have a majority opinion to it, stated:
[N]othing in our decision today affects in any way the discretion of a local school board to choose books to add to the libraries of their schools. Because we are concerned in this case with the suppression of ideas, our holding [457 U.S. 853, 872] today affects only the discretion to remove books. In brief, we hold that local school boards may not remove books from school library shelves simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books and seek by their removal to “prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion.” West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S., at 642. Such purposes stand inescapably condemned by our precedents.
The Island Trees case came from an incident in the school district located in Levittown, New York, in 1975. A group which called themselves Parents of New York United submitted a list of 11 books they considered “inappropriate” to the school board, which then removed the books from the library and proceeded to send them through the review committee. Even though the committee said five of nine titles should be returned to shelves, the school board overruled the decision, returning only two (the other two books in question were a book in the junior high school that contained the satirical essay “A Modest Proposal,” and a book in the 12th grade curriculum, and both were removed).
The school board made this decision because they were “anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-Sem[i]tic, and just plain filthy,” according to the case syllabus.
High school senior Steven Pico, in the case, helped bring the voices of four fellow high school students and one junior high school student into the story. All of them pushed back against the board’s decision. They believed — thanks, in part, to the precedent set with the Tinker vs. Des Moines case — that their First Amendment rights were being violated.
One possible reason why this case hasn’t been cited is that it wasn’t legally binding because there wasn’t a majority opinion. But because it also hasn’t been challenged, it stands as a powerful reminder of a few things: this isn’t and never has been the first time books in school libraries have been challenged, let alone that books by authors of color have been at the center of the discussion (the 11 titles included books by Piri Thomas, Langston Hughes, Richard Wright, Alice Childress, and Eldridge Cleaver); it’s not the first time that students have been forced to speak up for their First Amendment Rights; it’s noteworthy that the ruling stated this means books cannot be removed from school libraries because of disagreement with what they present (i.e., stories of those from the global majority and queer stories); that school boards have exerted more power than granted to them; and more.
When and if we begin to see lawsuits arising from today’s censorship landscape, watch for Island Trees to be cited and revisited. The Supreme Court isn’t stacked in favor of intellectual freedom right now, given the appointments made by the treasonous former administration, but prior rulings give weight to the reality that book censorship denies rights granted to young people in the First Amendment.
Onto this week’s book censorship news, with a toolkit for how to fight book bans and challenges, as well as how to spot fake news sites — many of which are fueling these censorship attempts. Note: This will be the final roundup of 2021. Roundups will continue beginning the first full week of 2022.
- The legality of this is really questionable, but Williamson County commissioners have decided to withhold CARES funding from the pandemic to two school districts in Central Texas — Leander and Round Rock — because of “X-Rated” books in their libraries.
- It’s Perfectly Normal will stay on shelves in Holmen, Wisconsin, schools.
- Urbandale, Iowa schools are keeping five challenged books on shelves.
- Central Kitsap district in Washington is putting Gender Queer back in the library, as well as returning a queer-positive student-created poster back to its rightful place. This is due to a new board president, a reminder of the power of individuals on a board in defending student intellectual freedom.
- Pella Public Library in Iowa is keeping Gender Queer on shelves.
- How Virginia Beach school board meetings became a battleground over six books.
- Bedford County, Virginia, is trying to figure out how to handle book challenges, outlining policy changes after a complaint about The Glass Castle (among other titles that a local Moms for Liberty group doesn’t like).
- Gender Queer, Monday’s Not Coming, and books by Ellen Hopkins are among those being challenged in Natrona County, Wyoming.
- Queer books and websites continue to be challenged and censored in Katy Independent School District in Texas.
- Wake County, North Carolina, public libraries removed Gender Queer from their shelves.
- Walla Walla, Washington, has a committee reviewing four books, including Gender Queer, The Bluest Eye, The Hate U Give, and All Boys Aren’t Blue.
- Tyler Texas Independent School District is reviewing a number of books being challenged.
- In Victoria, Texas, the public library is keeping all of their challenged books on shelves (despite one board member voting against the inclusion of 18 of those titles).
- Students and parents are talking about how the removal of 400 books from North East Independent School District (covered here) are all part of a political act. They’re not wrong.
- “Pornographic” is one of the buzzword mafia’s favored terms for a challenge, so it’s not surprising the parent angry about high schoolers reading The Perks of Being a Wallflower in an El Paso, Texas, area school used that to file complaint.
- South Carolina will leave the decision of books put into school libraries in the hands of local school districts, as opposed to the state.
- Why did Parkway, Ohio, schools ban Between The World and Me?
Here’s this week’s intellectual freedom hero:
And a couple more must-reads from authors experiencing challenges or outright censorship: author Jo Knowles talks about two of her queer-positive books being challenged in Texas and Derf Backderf talks about why his graphic memoir My Friend Dahmer has been banned.
Also In This Story Stream
- 74% of Parents Think Book Bans Infringe on Their Parental Rights: Book Censorship News, September 29, 2023
- Student Groups Against Book Bans: Book Censorship News, September 22, 2023
- Book Fairs Will See An Increase In Censorship Attempts This Year: Book Censorship News, September 15, 2023
- Championing Inclusivity in Library Collection Policies: Book Censorship News, September 8, 2023
- How To Alert Your School Board to Right-Wing Bad Actors: Book Censorship News, September 1, 2023
- Library Bomb Threats Continue to Increase: Book Censorship News, August 25, 2023
- Districts Are Turning to AI to Ban Books: Book Censorship News, August 18, 2023
- Age-Restricted Library Cards Aren’t a Solution. They’re a Liability: Book Censorship News, July 28, 2023
- How To Own A News Cycle: Book Censorship News, July 21, 2023
- Book Censorship News: July 14, 2023