10 Banned Books Talk Back

This is a guest post from Lady Vowell Smith. Lady is a writer, editor, and former English teacher who blogs about books—mostly classic ones—at The Snail on the Wall. Find her on Twitter @SnailonWall.

___________________

Books that get banned usually find themselves in that predicament because they’ve gone against the grain, struck an openly defiant pose, spoken out about the status quo. So, it’s not too surprising that when we mine the pages of a few oft-banned titles, we can uncover some pretty choice words for would-be censors. These 10 classic novels, all on the American Library Association’s list of Banned and Challenged Classics, deliver some powerful—and even prophetic—remarks toward the types that seek to silence them.

tkam 2

tkam

Harper Lee’s sensitive study of race relations in the pre–Civil Rights South continues to come under fire for the very issue it probes: race relations. It’s been challenged everywhere from New York to California to Canada. And people have attempted to ban it from schools because they believe it “represents institutionalized racism under the guise of good literature” (Indiana, 1981), “promotes white supremacy” (Tennessee, 2006), and “conflict[s] with the values of the community” (Texas, 1996).

 

grapes of wrath grapes of wrath

Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath has the distinction of actually being burned. It happened back in 1939, when  an Illinois public library found fault with its vulgar language. It has since been banned and challenged across the country, including in Missouri, Iowa, and Kern County, California, near where the novel is set.

song of solomon paperback

song of solomon

Song of Solomon has been removed from required reading lists in Georgia (1994) and from approved text lists in Maryland schools (1998) for passages that are “filthy and inappropriate” and for being considered, on the whole, “filth,” “trash,” and “repulsive.” It’s also been challenged over the past two decades by school systems in Ohio, Florida, and Michigan. Morrison’s Beloved has fared even worse. But that hasn’t prevented either one from soaring to classic status.

 

as-i-lay-dying as i lay dying

William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying has ruffled feathers for everything from including a masturbation scene to questioning the existence of God. It was banned in Mayfield, Kentucky schools in 1986 for “offensive and obscene passages referring to abortion and us[ing] God’s name in vain.” It’s since been challenged in several other schools around Kentucky and also in Carroll County, Maryland.

Brave New World brave new world

Sex, drugs, and suicide are the sources of discontent for those who have tried to ban Huxley’s Brave New WorldIn 1980, schools in Miller, Missouri, banned the novel from classrooms because it made promiscuous sex “look like fun.” Even as recently as 2008, an Idaho school district challenged the book based on its heavy handling of sex and drugs.

 

lord of the flies cover lord of the flies

Though William Golding’s Lord of the Flies has been challenged for decades around the United States and in Canada, perhaps the most interesting challenge came from a high school in Owen, North Carolina, which claimed in 1981 that the novel is “demoralizing inasmuch as it implies that man is little more than an animal.” Golding would be pleased with such a critique, because it means they got the point.

 

Catcher catcher in the rye

Looking at the long list of censor attempts on Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, you might wonder what school system, library, or classroom hasn’t tried to ban the story of Holden Caulfield. Repeatedly targeted for being “obscene” and even “blasphemous,” the novel mostly bothers parents who fear Holden’s language and view of the world might hit a little too close to home.

catch22_cover catch 22

It’s Catch-22‘s language, including the word “whores,” that most schools have objected to. The novel was banned repeatedly throughout the 1970s, in Ohio, Texas, and Washington—all school districts that purported to know much about literature, except how to appreciate it.

 

Animal Farm animal farm

In New York circa 1968, Animal Farm was listed as one of a handful of “problem books” because Orwell was labeled a communist. Its political perspective has made it subject to challenges in other states as well, from Wisconsin to Florida, and also in the United Arab Emirates and Russia.

gone with the wind

gone with the wind

Margaret Mitchell’s bestseller and Pulitzer Prize winner has provoked critics primarily for its depiction of slavery and use of the words “nigger” and “darkie.” It was banned from high school English classrooms in Anaheim, California’s Union school district (1978) and also challenged in schools in Waukegan, Illinois (1984). Frankly, I think she probably doesn’t care.

No need to mince words here: we are giving one lucky Book Riot reader $250 to blow at Amazon. Overstuff those stockings or get a jump on your New Year reading pile--up to you. Go here to enter. amz250_wide
VIEW COMMENTS