Posted by
Jeff
October 1, 2011
7 Comments MORE BY THIS AUTHOR
Beat the AlgorithmFiction

Beat the Algorithm: GAME OF THRONES Edition

Welcome to the inaugural edition of Book Riot’s “Beat the Algorithm,” pitting bloggers and booksellers against Amazon’s algorithm for recommendation supremacy.

This week’s recommendation request comes from Jill in Brooklyn, who is looking for her next read after loving Game of Thrones. Here’s what she said about it:

“The first time I tried the book, I read one page, got a whiff of ‘wildlings’ and ‘Others’ in ye olde English and put it down with disgust thinking Martin was trying to recreate Lord of the Rings.  But, after finding out it’s more in the line of kings, knights, honor and treachery, I had nothing else to read so gave it another go.  In the end, I loved the character development — I’m a sucker for watching a wide cast become three dimensional, and having the Republican debates in the background casts a new light on talk of power and dominion and the concerns of the smallfolk.  I also appreciate that Martin doesn’t have any sacred cows and isn’t afraid to take risks with beloved characters.”
_________________________

Alright, so Amazon is up first, and the algorithm selects…..The Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss.

Here’s Amazon’s Review:
“Harry Potter fans craving a new mind-blowing series should look no further than The Name of the Wind—the first book in a trilogy about an orphan boy who becomes a legend. Full of music, magic, love, and loss, Patrick Rothfuss’s vivid and engaging debut fantasy knocked our socks off.”

__________________________

Next up, Book Riot contributor and book blogger, Rachel. She recommends….The Pillars of the Earth by Ken Follett.

Here’s Rachel’s explanation:

“It should be stated, right off the bat, there is no other author quite like George R.R. Martin. His blend of high fantasy with complex characters and intricate plot twists is unique. Too many fantasy writers depend on fantasy cliche to move their books forward, but Martin needs no such crutch. Because of his talent and admired place in the genre, recommendations are… difficult to say the least. So I suggest leaving fantasy all together. The points of Game of Thrones you enjoyed are not solely part of fantasy, and Ken Follett’s The Pillars of the Earth takes many of the same risks with equally satisfying results. An epic unto itself, Follett’s tome chronicles, basically, the building of a cathedral. But it jumps points of view among a long cast of characters with intrigue and manipulation at the center of it all. The name of the game is self-promotion, and just as in Martin’s series, the characters are subject to the karma that they each deserve. Follett also has no “sacred cows,” and as the books spans several generations in the 12th century, the inherently difficult setting provides as much background for the fates of beloved characters as in Martin’s novels. Personally, my reactions to Martin and to Follett were similar – disdain for “copying” a genre, and then utter, slack-jawed amazement.”

_____________________________

So there you have it. Who do you think gave a better recommendation? Leave a comment and let us know. We’ll give you an update in a couple of days after Jill makes a pick…and crowns the winner of this first match.

About Jeff

Jeff O'Neal is the editor of Book Riot. He also blogs about media, publishing and technology at Critical Linking. Follow him on Twitter: @readingape

All posts by Jeff

  • Alexandra Jacunski

    I’m going to have to go with Amazon, only because I love A Song of Ice and Fire, but hated The Pillars of the Earth…

  • Lily

    Who do I think wrote the better review? Rachel.
    Who made me want to read the book more? Amazon.

  • Tanya Perez

    As much as I decry AMZN’s business models, the algorithm is actually pretty good. It indexes millions of purchases & ratings, in this case those who bought and loved A Game of Thrones *and* The Name of the Wind *as well as* A Pillar of the Earth (and every other book sold through their web-site); whereas I have no idea if Rachel read The Name of the Wind and might have also recommended it over A Pillar of the Earth if she had. I hate to admit it; but in this round, AMZN’s recommendation is better, though Rachel’s recommendation is more thoughtful.

  • http://www.entomologyofabookworm.com Kerry M.

    Having read A Game of Thrones and The Name of the Wind (but not A Pillar of the Earth), I’m going with Rachel. And not just because I like book bloggers more than Amazon (although Rachel, I trust your opinion more than Amazon’s any day!). Rachel’s point is spot-on — it sounds like Jill enjoyed Game of Thrones more because of its power and politics and character development than because of its dragons and magic. Plus, in the world of fantasy, Game of Thrones is pretty low magic. Name of the Wind is an excellent, excellent read if you are looking for magic and romance and spells and an ode to storytelling, but it’s not particularly high on politics and power plays, and as likable (or unlikable) as the characters are, the character development is not nearly so rich and detailed as Martin’s. Though it’s a great fantasy read, from the snippet we have from Jill, it’s just not what she’s looking for. Rachel – 1. Amazon – 0.

  • Trisha Dandurand

    Pillars of the Earth would definitely be my choice. Fantastic read!

  • Anonymous

    I love all three books so I’m saying it’s a tie (and I frequently recommend Rothfuss for fans of Martin, so good work Amazon!). Also, if someone is looking more for fantasy elements, then Amazon wins. But if someone is just a fan of EPIC books, then the Follett is a good rec.

  • Pingback: Beat the Algorithm, GAME OF THRONES Edition: The Winner Is… | BOOK RIOT